Message boards : Number crunching : no longer on the map
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hi, sensor No. 13304, was on the map and running along nicely, but seems to have disappeared off the map again. I do not know when it happened as I was alerted to it by a friend. I have looked in my account and for me, the local map is showing and my pointer is still in the place I put it, however the main map does not show me. | |
ID: 3091 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
You haven't sent back any results since '1 Mar 2015 | 14:02:43 UTC' but you have 2 WUs running - Maybe they are both hung as they are fighting for the sensor? | |
ID: 3093 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Yes I saw that, although in my Boinc Manager it only shows one actual task. I tried resetting the project but it does not seem to have rectified the problem | |
ID: 3094 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Is the sensor still plugged into the same usb port as before, and I take it you've tried the old reboot-the-pc method of seeing if that'll fix it? Bus 006 Device 002: ID 16c0:05df Van Ooijen Technische Informatica HID device except mice, keyboards, and joysticks Not sure what else to suggest. Hope someone else has some ideas for you. I'm hoping it's just Windows being annoying and not the sensor. | |
ID: 3095 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thank you Gary and Chertsy Al, yes the sensor is still plugged into original USB, and the program you suggested has detected it is plugged in. I tried unplugging sensor resetting project and restarting pc but the rogue workunit sample_4525948_0 is still showing as running when it is not. I think this is the issue as, previously suggested by Chertsy Al as for some reason my 2hr WU are taking considerably longer. I had hoped it would go once I reset etc but it still shows on my account as in progress. | |
ID: 3096 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I seem to have re-appeared on the map although the rogue WU is still showing as in progress on my account. I have messaged Szopler about it. | |
ID: 3097 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Your work units are getting credits again too, it looks back to normal apart from that odd task. How strange. | |
ID: 3098 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
So today at 18.05 I get this message | |
ID: 3099 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Today I have this WU that ran for over 7 hrs before I aborted it.(I am set for 2hr WU in preferences) | |
ID: 3100 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Couple of thoughts ... | |
ID: 3102 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
It was all working absolutely fine until the 1/3/2015 - I am moving it to another USB port to see if any difference is made. I do have avg but I am loathe to remove it just for Boinc as it has not caused a problem before and is giving me no indication that it is causing a problem now. Any suggestions for an alternative antivirus? | |
ID: 3103 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
haha last post should say 0.05 - 0.06 - anyway, I changed USB port and time and it seems to have settled down overnight. I shall keep a close eye on it and see how it goes. I am wondering why my tasks that took double the specified time to run but have been completed and validated why no credit has been awarded for them? | |
ID: 3104 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Re. not getting any credit for the long running tasks - this is exactly what I was getting right at the very start when I first plugged my sensor in. Default 2-hour WUs taking 5 hours or more, very little cpu, validated ok but no credit. It was something strange in the Linux security setup though, once I'd updated the relevant file to say the sensor was allowed to be plugged in, the run time dropped to 2 hours for subsequent WUs, cpu went up a bit, and they started getting credits. I don't see why Windows should throw the same wobbly after it's been working for a while, though as ChertseyAl said, it could be security related. Does AVG have any USB-specific settings? I think if it was USB power saving, the sensor would go off, and if you're still seeing numbers then power must be getting to it (and yes, unplugging it & putting it back in effectively resets it). | |
ID: 3105 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Just out of interest - is there anything in AVG's "virus vault" (or quarantine), and/or if you look at its history, did it do a scan at about the time(s) your sensor stopped being recognised? | |
ID: 3106 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ooooohhhhhh, wait a minute, loook at this : | |
ID: 3107 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
ok thank you Gary and CherstyAl- I read the article and had a look and yes the power management was ticked to allow windows to control power to USB. I have disabled this for all USB ports as am not sure how to work out which is which relative to device manager. This promptly gave me BSOD which disappeared too quickly for me to read beyond USB driver error. | |
ID: 3121 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I can understand your concern, it is a weird one. I've been having a look back through all your work units to see if I can find any pattern or anything out of the ordinary, but am stumped. It seems to be working again at the moment, which is good I suppose. | |
ID: 3122 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Hi, getting fed up now as it has happened again today at about 17.30. I have no idea why it is doing it. I cannot place a single event that coincides with this project messing up but it is happening nearly every day now. I am going to remove the project and add it again in a last ditch attempt to sort it out. It would have been nice to have had a reply from project admins or to have had them analyse my WU's which are still running allegedly (I think there are 6 now that think they are running) | |
ID: 3123 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Do you guys think I should try Application/Sensor debug mode? So far everything has been based on my pc having the error, as opposed to the sensor itself. | |
ID: 3126 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I also notice it is using more than one slot, it seems to switch between 6 and 0, is this normal, I thought projects stayed on the same slot? I have an stderr file that I copied also. I wont post it as of yet as it is of course rather long. If this will help work out the problem let me know and I will post it. | |
ID: 3127 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I don't know what the debug mode does. More messages I guess, but haven't tried it. | |
ID: 3128 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
FWIW, my sensor is currently on an old Vista32 laptop, and it's generally running Radioactive, Primaboinca, Universe, SRBase and WUProp at the moment (only a single core, so only one non-NCI project at a time obviously). It never gets powered down, nothing auto-updates, and there's no AV or internet security (lol) junk on it. Oh, and it's on a wired network connection. I have also run it successfully on an ancient Celeron desktop and an Atom laptop, both XP32, again with no problems, except both had slightly flaky network connections which is why I switched to a machine that's wired straight to my router. | |
ID: 3130 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Gary, the comment you are referring to I believe was someone who had set their WU to something like 20 hrs and the comment was that it should be shorter due to the stderr not being able to hold all the relevant info for them to sort their particular error out . | |
ID: 3131 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
re: "Found sensor [unknown version 609 (2,61)]" | |
ID: 3132 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks, malawarebytes is the one I uninstalled, typical. I shall see how it goes and add removing avg to my list of 'things to try'. At the moment it seems to have settled. I have said that several times before so am not confident it is resolved yet. | |
ID: 3134 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I get that same unknown version 609 (2,61) message at the start of all my tasks as well, and the tasks are completing ok, so I don't think that's a problem. The 2,61 is the same as the version number of the kit's firmware too, v2.61, so it does at least confirm the computer is communicating with the sensor. | |
ID: 3138 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
So, it was running along nicely and now once again it has hit a snag, it seems to run fine in 'slot 0' but when that changes as it did today to slot 15, the WU's just run over time to double expected time or longer. Can anyone tell me how to resolve this issue? | |
ID: 3142 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
My guess is that you've excluded slot 0 from AVG's meddling and as a result it runs happily from there. Any other slot could be being screwed up by AVG. You need to exclude the whole of the BOINC data folder structure from your program destroyer, sorry, 'virus scanner'. But even then a new subdirectory (slots folder) might not be automatically excluded from interference by AV crapware. | |
ID: 3143 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
ChertseyAl - lol :-) | |
ID: 3144 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
OK so it wasn't AVG, I have just cancelled a 12 hr unfinished WU . Not been on pc today until 10.15 pm so it is not a programme I am using during the day that is causing the issue. | |
ID: 3145 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Regarding the credit awarded, it's relevant to ''run time secs'' of the wu not the cpu time. There is no change in that if you go back through my list of tasks you will see that all wu that go over 7300 run time get awarded the higher credit. These vary through the day and not all tasks receive the higher credits as you can see below from my list of the last few tasks my pc has done, I think this is probably normal. | |
ID: 3146 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ok, that's probably not significant then. If the web-server account on your system is not 'apache', add a <httpd_user> element to your config.xml file. Otherwise antique deletion won't work. I don't think I even have a web server on this machine, I wouldn't have thought many people would have, so don't know if this is relevant, but it's the nearest I've found to anything about slots not being tidied up. So far anyway. My other thought was maybe one of your other projects is interfering with Radioactive at home. You could try temporarily disabling each of the others one by one (or a few at a time) with the "no more tasks" option so they stop running when the current task finishes, then if you still have problems with Radioactive, you'll know those projects weren't the problem, so re-enable them & try it on different one(s)? | |
ID: 3147 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ok so I do get an error message in the event log regarding deletion of r@h files stating that boinc is unable to remove ??.xml.?? then when a new wu comes it mentions something about being unable to download r@h?? as it already exists. | |
ID: 3149 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
a project conflict would likely be affecting other users also - ah, yes, of course, scrap that idea then! Hmm, maybe I'll just plod right through the list of users who've made it onto the map and see if we really are the only two using AMD A8 APUs. May take me a while but I'm interested to know. Did you try the debug mode to see what it does? If it causes hassle on the admins side, maybe they'll take notice and have a look at it too? ;-) | |
ID: 3150 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
lol,good plan, but I thought they would have noticed all the aborted or failed WU's and I did contact szopler directly- is it safe for my pc to try debug mode, I don't know what it does though? | |
ID: 3151 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ok so I do get an error message in the event log regarding deletion of r@h files stating that boinc is unable to remove ??.xml.?? then when a new wu comes it mentions something about being unable to download r@h?? as it already exists. Aha ... So there's a file permissions problem then. Do you switch users on that machine, or log off at all? Did you install BOINC to be shared by all users or just the user that installed it? Maybe you did a service install? I'm thinking (almost certainly incorrectly!) that you've got multiple users or accounts on the machine, and as a result sometimes the account that's logged in doesn't own the files the were downloaded by the previous user so can't delete them or overwrite them with the new WU. The only file that sticks around is the sensors.xml file I believe, so maybe when the project switches slots something goes wrong with creating a new one. Don't know much about this sort of stuff to be honest :) Perhaps it might be simpler for you to build a Wilson cloud chamber and just look at the pretty streaks that appear. Old-skool FTW ;) ____________ | |
ID: 3153 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Ok so no other users on this pc, guest account is switched off also, no need to log out or switch user. Not a service install. so maybe when the project switches slots something goes wrong with creating a new one. aha, we go back to the slot problem. I tend to agree with you here ChertseyAl but am yet to work out why it only happens sometimes, I wonder if the time allowed for this function to happen is not quite long enough so when the new WU tries to use the slot, it appears as if it is still used by the previous WU as it has not emptied quickly enough. Perhaps it might be simpler for you to build a Wilson cloud chamber and just look at the pretty streaks that appear. Old-skool FTW ;) In the spirit of kit making here is one I knocked up using my sons bicycle pump and an old eye solution bottle lol ![]() | |
ID: 3154 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I've finished checking every single dot on the map looking for anyone else with v2.61 sensors up and running (they show up with GRS v0 on the little graphic under the world map when you select a sensor on there) - there are only 5 so far! Two are running Linux on ARM processors, there's me with Linux on an AMD A8, you with Win 7 on an AMD A8, and one with Win XP on a Pentium. That might explain why nobody else is having the same problem yet, if it's specific to the new v2.61 sensors. Sensor id user Computer 13304 Euphoriabuzz AMD A8 6600K, Win 7 14082 (me) AMD A8 3270K, Linux 3.13.0 (Mint 17.1) 14133 Krzysztof Pentium E2180, Win XP 14139 DarkSoul ARM v6, Linux 3.18.7 14233 jaca ARM v6, Linux 3.18.7 I'll keep checking back to see if any new v2.61 dots have been added! Can't believe there are only 5 so far out of the 102 kits which were sent out, but I'm pretty sure I've checked the list correctly. | |
ID: 3156 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
ps - in an effort to boost numbers, I've just bought another kit off eBay which someone was selling because they didn't know how to build it. I'll get that built and hopefully sell it on as a working unit in a week or so, so we can get another v2.61 user on the map! :-) | |
ID: 3157 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
wow you must have been at that for ages. Thanks. Well so far since I have managed 18 WU's in a row since deleting the project from the program files and then reinstalling it. It is too soon to know if it has been resolved or not. | |
ID: 3158 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
ps - in an effort to boost numbers, I've just bought another kit off eBay which someone was selling because they didn't know how to build it. That's a shame, there are probably a lot of people out there like me who cannot make the sensor themselves, if they have been waiting forever to get on the list then they may not realise it is not sent out whole any more. I'll get that built and hopefully sell it on as a working unit in a week or so, so we can get another v2.61 user on the map! :-) Good news for you though, will that be another linux? You will have to find another roundabout !! | |
ID: 3159 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
you must have been at that for ages hmm - it did take a couple of hours, in between cups of tea & doing other things to stop me going cross-eyed! Interesting seeing what others are using though. they may not realise it is not sent out whole any more yes, seems to have caught a few out, though as I read it this was just a trial run, possible that future ones may be ready made again? Which would be a shame because it's a really nicely designed pcb and box and I enjoyed building ours. will that be another linux? You will have to find another roundabout I think there were more Windows users than Linux overall, just the Linux ones seem to be quicker at getting the kits built perhaps. We like to fiddle with things like this more I guess! Yes, my favourite roundabout, not far from where I live ;-) | |
ID: 3160 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Well considering the server has been down for 8 hours today and there is no message from Szopler or Admin about it- I have given up on this thread ever getting an answer from them. If they cannot interact and communicate about anything other than ordering and paying for kits then this feels like it is less of a project and more of a small business. I hope your new kit is straight forward for you to make. | |
ID: 3161 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Well considering the server has been down for 8 hours today and there is no message from Szopler or Admin about it- I am guessing it was to do with the eclipse, perhaps they shut it down to prevent false readings ____________ | |
ID: 3162 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I'm hoping it wasn't deliberate. I was interested to see if the radiation levels increased or decreased during the eclipse, they wouldn't be false readings if it really did change. I forgot to check the front panel to see what it was reading, too busy taking photos! | |
ID: 3163 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Yesterday server off situation was regarding to late bill payment date. Just email reminder about payment didn't arrive to right person... | |
ID: 3164 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Well thank you for the reply, nice to know you are reading the posts here. Shame that you do not have anything to say about the actual issue of failing WU's. There are 45 posts on this thread and only one of them (the one about money) generates a reply!!!!! Also, the project never was a commercial project. I said it 'FEELS' like it as the only post that gets any attention is the one to order new kits. This project should be mindful of the fact that it's participants have paid money and spent time making the sensors in order to run your project. If someone is having problems running the project or issues with your WU's you would think that as project scientists, someone would be interested enough to try and look into it. I think this is a worthwhile project to run and it would be a shame if it did not progress beyond it's current reach across the map because it has earned itself a bad reputation!!! Ask people who run multiple BOINC projects and they will tell you there are good projects and poor projects, and the list of poor ones nearly always comes down to the fact that the participants cannot get any response from the Team running the project. | |
ID: 3170 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Firstly, apologise that I'm not always on forum. | |
ID: 3180 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks for the response(s) Krzyszp :-) | |
ID: 3184 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Gary and ChertseyAl - famous last words but since I deleted the folder from the program data everything has been running smoothly. I assume from this that my initial download of R@H master files was in some way corrupt or became corrupted on 1st March (possibly from not reading the date jump from 28 Feb correctly). So it was a project software issue I think, not anything to so with the sensor itself. | |
ID: 3185 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
no longer on the map