Any explanation for this peak? Add sensor

Author	Message
Saenger Send message Joined: 16 Jun 11 Posts: 165 Credit: 602,207 RAC: 148	Message 668 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 16:04:33 UTC
I just saw in my sig this peak: I've copied the picture, because it will probably leave the sig soon (screenshot taken at 1600UTC). The detector sits on my window sill in about 7m height at a public street. How long is one whatever at the bottom btw? ____________ Gruesse vom Saenger
ID: 668 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ChertseyAl Send message Joined: 16 Jun 11 Posts: 178 Credit: 654,725 RAC: 149	Message 669 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 18:37:20 UTC - in response to Message 668.
How long is one whatever at the bottom btw? 40 seconds: http://radioactiveathome.org/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=37&nowrap=true#398 Quite a sharp spike - Electrical interference? Gamma Ray Burst? LHC exploded? Radioactive pigeon flying past? ;) Al. ____________
ID: 669 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

ChertseyAl Send message Joined: 16 Jun 11 Posts: 178 Credit: 654,725 RAC: 149	Message 670 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 18:41:49 UTC
Actually, it would nice to be able see one's own graph with other sensors within a reasonable distance automagically, with the times aligned. Would be useful for checking 'events' like this. Given the limited number of sensors it would probably be OK to display all of the graphs on one page. Just a thought :) Al. ____________
ID: 670 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Dagorath Send message Joined: 4 Jul 11 Posts: 151 Credit: 42,738 RAC: 0	Message 672 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 19:25:38 UTC - in response to Message 668.
The detector sits on my window sill in about 7m height at a public street. If you are far from a high traffic street then it's probably a glitch. If you are on a major thoroughfare then there is a good possibility someone drove by your window with a load of radioactive material that was leaking radiation. Perhaps some stolen plutonium? A terrorist with a dirty bomb? It happens. ____________
ID: 672 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Yeti45 Send message Joined: 31 Jul 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,217,386 RAC: 1	Message 673 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 20:29:42 UTC - in response to Message 668.
maybe you did a reset on your PC and the graph was not generated as intended? look here: http://radioactiveathome.org/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=60 this was in the results for your host-id: ..... 3320305,91,10,2011-12-03 11:52:56,53.064697,8.812038,0.663,n 3320306,91,16,2011-12-03 11:53:35,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n 3322137,91,160,2011-12-03 12:04:19,53.064697,8.812038,10.054,f 3322138,91,6,2011-12-03 12:04:59,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n 3322139,91,8,2011-12-03 12:05:39,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n ..... maybe time and date are wrong.. or are there only old dates in the database?
ID: 673 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Dagorath Send message Joined: 4 Jul 11 Posts: 151 Credit: 42,738 RAC: 0	Message 674 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 22:16:56 UTC - in response to Message 673.
Yes, that explains it and I bet I can get a big spike in my graph simply by shutting down BOINC for 10 minutes then restarting it. The sensor will accumulate lots of pulses and report them all on one line which will cause a spike, if the theory is correct. Then the graphing function needs to divide the pulses by the sample time or something like that? ____________
ID: 674 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Dagorath Send message Joined: 4 Jul 11 Posts: 151 Credit: 42,738 RAC: 0	Message 675 - Posted: 4 Jan 2012 \| 23:29:36 UTC - in response to Message 674.
Here are the data: 6201896,1016,10,2012-01-04 22:49:11,49.663364,-112.798454,0.659,n 6203174,1016,8,2012-01-04 22:50:12,49.663364,-112.798454,0.358,f 6203175,1016,10,2012-01-04 22:50:52,49.663364,-112.798454,0.659,n Hmmm, I shutdown BOINC for 10 minutes but the time indicates only .358 minutes and I see no spike on my graph. Mulligan. ____________
ID: 675 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

TJM Project administrator Project developer Project tester Send message Joined: 16 Apr 11 Posts: 291 Credit: 1,368,683 RAC: 56	Message 714 - Posted: 23 Jan 2012 \| 19:17:43 UTC
Any shutdowns and restarts should not affect readings. The sensor simply keeps running with or without the app. There were some minor issues resuming previously suspended workunit, but I think they were fixed.
ID: 714 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: / Reply Quote

Author

Message

Saenger
Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 11
Posts: 165
Credit: 602,207
RAC: 148

I just saw in my sig this peak:

I've copied the picture, because it will probably leave the sig soon (screenshot taken at 1600UTC).
The detector sits on my window sill in about 7m height at a public street.

How long is one whatever at the bottom btw?

____________
Gruesse vom Saenger

ID: 668 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

ChertseyAl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 11
Posts: 178
Credit: 654,725
RAC: 149

How long is one whatever at the bottom btw?

40 seconds: http://radioactiveathome.org/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=37&nowrap=true#398

Quite a sharp spike - Electrical interference? Gamma Ray Burst? LHC exploded? Radioactive pigeon flying past? ;)

Al.

____________

ID: 669 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

ChertseyAl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 11
Posts: 178
Credit: 654,725
RAC: 149

Actually, it would nice to be able see one's own graph with other sensors within a reasonable distance automagically, with the times aligned.

Would be useful for checking 'events' like this.

Given the limited number of sensors it would probably be OK to display all of the graphs on one page.

Just a thought :)

Al.

____________

ID: 670 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

Dagorath

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 11
Posts: 151
Credit: 42,738
RAC: 0

The detector sits on my window sill in about 7m height at a public street.

If you are far from a high traffic street then it's probably a glitch. If you are on a major thoroughfare then there is a good possibility someone drove by your window with a load of radioactive material that was leaking radiation. Perhaps some stolen plutonium? A terrorist with a dirty bomb? It happens.

____________

ID: 672 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

Yeti45
Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 11
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,217,386
RAC: 1

maybe you did a reset on your PC and the graph was not generated as intended?
look here: http://radioactiveathome.org/boinc/forum_thread.php?id=60

this was in the results for your host-id:

.....
3320305,91,10,2011-12-03 11:52:56,53.064697,8.812038,0.663,n
3320306,91,16,2011-12-03 11:53:35,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n
3322137,91,160,2011-12-03 12:04:19,53.064697,8.812038,10.054,f
3322138,91,6,2011-12-03 12:04:59,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n
3322139,91,8,2011-12-03 12:05:39,53.064697,8.812038,0.662,n
.....

maybe time and date are wrong.. or are there only old dates in the database?

ID: 673 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

Dagorath

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 11
Posts: 151
Credit: 42,738
RAC: 0

Yes, that explains it and I bet I can get a big spike in my graph simply by shutting down BOINC for 10 minutes then restarting it. The sensor will accumulate lots of pulses and report them all on one line which will cause a spike, if the theory is correct. Then the graphing function needs to divide the pulses by the sample time or something like that?

____________

ID: 674 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

Dagorath

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 11
Posts: 151
Credit: 42,738
RAC: 0

Here are the data:

6201896,1016,10,2012-01-04 22:49:11,49.663364,-112.798454,0.659,n
6203174,1016,8,2012-01-04 22:50:12,49.663364,-112.798454,0.358,f
6203175,1016,10,2012-01-04 22:50:52,49.663364,-112.798454,0.659,n

Hmmm, I shutdown BOINC for 10 minutes but the time indicates only .358 minutes and I see no spike on my graph.

Mulligan.

____________

ID: 675 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote

TJM
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 11
Posts: 291
Credit: 1,368,683
RAC: 56

Any shutdowns and restarts should not affect readings.
The sensor simply keeps running with or without the app.

There were some minor issues resuming previously suspended workunit, but I think they were fixed.

ID: 714 | Rating: 0 | rate:

Reply Quote